Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. Martin
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Orange Circuit Court; D. M. Alspaugh, Judge. Action by Byron E. Martin against tbe Chicago, Indianapolis and Louisville Railway Company for damages. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtComstock, C. J.
Appellee was plaintiff below. The complaint is in two paragraphs. They do not materially differ. It is alleged in the first that appellant posted notices in Pekin that on October 20, 1899, it would, stop all trains at Pekin; that on said day appellee purchased a ticket from Pekin to Louisville and return; that on the evening of the said day, when appellee was returning from Louisville to Pekin, the conductor refused to stop the train at Pekin, and carried appellee on to Salem, a distance of fifteen miles; that appellee was compelled to pay the additional fare from Pekin to Salem, was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Johnson v. CulverIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Rudolph v. LandwerlenIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Nelson v. WelchIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Mainard v. ReiderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
- Troyer v. State ex rel. NicholsIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Perry, Matthews-Buskirk Stone Co. v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- National Paper Box Co. v. Aetna Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913