Legal Opinion

Moore v. County of Delaware

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 2, 2009No. Docket 08-2426-cvPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants-cross-claimants-appellants Joseph A. Andreno, Kurt R. Palmer, and the County of Delaware (collectively, “appellants”), as prevailing parties before this Court, see Moore v. Andreno, 08-2426-cv, 2009 WL 2222938, 2009 U.S.App. LEXIS 16452 (2d Cir. July 27, 2009), now move to recover costs incurred in litigating their appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 39. Plaintiffappellee Richard B. Moore has filed objections to that motion, contending principally that costs should not be imposed because Moore is “nearly destitute.”

Because we find that equitable considerations militate against taxing costs…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Transatlantic Marine Claims Agency, Inc. v. Ace Shipping Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  2. John Whitfield v. Charles Scully, Former Supt. Gail Haponik C.O. Tornabene C.O. C. Mitchell John and Jane DoesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  3. Robert W. Kelley, Cross-Appellees v. Metropolitan County Board of Education, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  4. Moore v. AndrenoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  5. Tung Mung Development Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Swiatkowski v. CitibankDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
  2. Steve Moore v. Citgo Refining & Chemicals CCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  3. Ozaltin v. OzaltinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  4. Souratgar v. FairCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  5. Mendoza v. SilvaDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2014

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API