Legal Opinion

Tanberg v. Sholtis

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 16, 2005No. 03-2231PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCONNELL, Circuit Judge.

Following their arrest for being in a municipal park after it was closed, the Plaintiffs, Deena Tanberg and Valerie Ortega, brought suit asserting state and federal claims of false arrest, a federal claim of excessive force, and state law claims of assault and battery against the Defendants, Officer Tom Sholtis and the City of Albuquerque. After ordering a bifurcated trial, the district court granted Officer Sholtis’s motion for judgment as a matter of law with regard to Plaintiffs’ state and federal claims for false arrest, and the jury found for Officer Sholtis on…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Lee Thompson, Administrator of the Estate of James Thompson and Paulette White-Thompson v. City of Chicago and Officer Bradley HespeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  2. Howard v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  3. Vondrak v. City of Las CrucesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  4. Geraldine Johnson v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. Lopez-MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API