Legal Opinion

Locke, Huleatt & Co. v. Shreck

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1898No. 7995PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from the district court of York county. Tried below before Bates, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Sullivan, J.'

On December 26, 1891, Morris Alexander, being the owner, and in possession, of a stock of general merchan*473dise in the city of York, mortgaged the same to J. Rosenbaum to secure an indebtedness of $1,347. The mortgagee took immediate possession. Three days later a second mortgage covering the same property was executed by Alexander to the-plaintiffs, Locke, Huleatt & Co., to secure the sum of $416.81 due for merchandise previously purchased of them. Both mortgages were duly filed in the proper office and their validity appears oh the record unquestioned. Afterwards, D. B. Fisk &…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ring v. NealeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Kennett v. Peters & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  3. Hill v. Campbell Commission Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Raymond Bros. & Co. v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Chicago Lumber Co. v. FisherNebraska Supreme Court · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Southwell v. De BoerNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  2. STATE SECURITIES COMPANY v. SvobodaNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Moss v. MarksNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Hippodrome Amusement Co. v. RedickNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  5. STATE SECURITIES COMPANY v. SvobodaNebraska Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API