Raymond Bros. & Co. v. Miller
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Saline county. Tried below before Hastings, J.
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.
This is an action of conversion. There was a judgment for plaintiffs below, and defendants prosecute error.
Of the numerous errors assigned and argued by counsel, we do not deem it necessary to discuss more than one, *507namely, that the petition fails to state sufficient facts to constitute a cause of action, which was duly raised at the outset of the trial in the court below by objections to the admission of testimony on that ground, and again after verdict by the motion for a new trial, as well as by proper assignment in the petition in error filed herein. The allegations of the petition, so…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- M. P. Musser & Co. v. KingNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Camp v. PollockNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Randall v. PersonsNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Garber v. Palmer, Blanchard & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Sharp v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- STATE SECURITIES COMPANY v. SvobodaNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
- George Adams & Frederick Co. v. South Omaha Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Hill v. Campbell Commission Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- J. Thompson & Sons Manufacturing Co. v. NichollsNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Coulter v. CummingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.