Legal Opinion

Moss v. Marks

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1904No. 13,256PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to the district court for Jefferson county: Charles B. Letton, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Glanville, C.

The plaintiff in error was, by the district court for Jefferson county, allowed to intervene as defendant in a replevin action for the purpose of protecting his so-called attorney’s *702lien upon the replevied property for the value of services rendered to the original defendants in the action, who had attempted to dismiss their appeal to that court from a judgment against them in county court, and absconded. The plaintiff had judgment, and the intervener brings error. A full history of the case would be somewhat tedious and will be omitted, because, in the view we take, which is the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Elliott v. HaydenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. Bell v. Perry & TownsendSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  3. Pyle v. WarrenNebraska Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Peterson v. LodwickNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Depriest v. McKinstryNebraska Supreme Court · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Oregon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Baron v. Peoples National Bank of SecaucusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  3. Alliance Loan & Investment Co. v. MorganNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Turner v. GrimesNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  5. State Ex Rel. Schaub v. City of ScottsbluffNebraska Supreme Court · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API