Moss v. Marks
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Jefferson county: Charles B. Letton, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Glanville, C.
The plaintiff in error was, by the district court for Jefferson county, allowed to intervene as defendant in a replevin action for the purpose of protecting his so-called attorney’s *702lien upon the replevied property for the value of services rendered to the original defendants in the action, who had attempted to dismiss their appeal to that court from a judgment against them in county court, and absconded. The plaintiff had judgment, and the intervener brings error. A full history of the case would be somewhat tedious and will be omitted, because, in the view we take, which is the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Elliott v. HaydenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Bell v. Perry & TownsendSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Pyle v. WarrenNebraska Supreme Court · 1873
- Peterson v. LodwickNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Depriest v. McKinstryNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Oregon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Baron v. Peoples National Bank of SecaucusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Alliance Loan & Investment Co. v. MorganNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
- Turner v. GrimesNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
- State Ex Rel. Schaub v. City of ScottsbluffNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.