Legal Opinion
United States v. Dodge
United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals
Decided March 16, 2004No. ACM 34870PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MALLOY, Judge:
This ease began as a guilty plea general court-martial, before a military judge sitting alone, and ended as a lengthy, complex and acrimonious mixed-plea case before members. Initially, under the terms of a pretrial agreement, the convening authority agreed to not approve confinement in excess of 5 years in exchange for the appellant’s offer to plead guilty to most, but not all, of the charges (in some instances by exceptions and substitutions), and to be sentenced by a military judge alone.1 Ultimately, however, the appellant withdrew from the pretrial…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- Ashcroft v. Free Speech CoalitionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. MezzanattoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. AndersonUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
- United States v. RangelUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
- United States v. DodgeUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
- United States v. KawaiUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2006
- United States v. AguilarUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.