Legal Opinion

Sparks v. Mount

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1922No. 1009PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blume, Justice.

The parties will herein be referred to in the same manner as in the case below. It will not be necessary, for the purposes of this case, to set forth in detail the rights of the defendants as between themselves. There is some conflict in the evidence as to whether or not the defendants had discovered oil on December 22, 1919, but for the purposes of this case, Ave shall have to treat that as an established fact. With that so taken, the evidence in this case is substantially undisputed, and we must determine as to Avhether the judgment herein was warranted thereunder. The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Pool v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Richardson v. McNultyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Miller v. ChrismanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Geomet Exploration, Ltd. v. Lucky Mc Uranium Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Granlick v. JohnstonWyoming Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API