Legal Opinion
Humpherys v. Nager
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 17, 1997No. CV-96-0674 (DGT)PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TRAGER, District Judge:
Plaintiff Marie Humpherys, an attorney appearing pro se, seeks forty million dollars in damages based on alleged violations of her constitutional rights. She has alleged a potpourri of violations, claiming that the defendants have conspired to violate her 13th and 14th amendment rights, as well as her rights under the Civil Rights Act of 1886, Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the 1991 Civil Rights Act, and the New York State Constitution. Plaintiff has named the following as defendants: Sanford Nager, 25-35 Tennis Associates, Governor George…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hilska v. JonesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Rene v. CITIBANK NADistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Houghton v. CardoneDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2003
- Seils v. Rochester City School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2002
- Pelman Ex Rel. Pelman v. McDonald's Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.