Legal Opinion
Pelman Ex Rel. Pelman v. McDonald's Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 24, 2005No. 02 Civ. 7821(RWS)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant McDonald’s Corporation (“McDonald’s”) has moved pursuant to Rule 12(e) for a more definite statement of the plaintiffs’ amended complaint filed on February 19, 2003.
For the reasons set forth below, the motion for a more definite statement is granted in part and denied in part.
Prior Proceedings
The plaintiffs commenced suit by filing their initial complaint on August 22, 2002 in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Bronx County. Defendant removed the action to the Southern District of New York on September 30, 2002. By opinion of January 22, 2003,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Stutman v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Gaidon v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Kelly v. L.L. Cool J.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Small v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- LVL XIII Brands, Inc. v. Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Pennsylvania Employee, Benefit Trust Fund v. Zeneca, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Doll v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- M & T Mortgage Corp. v. WhiteDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Consumer Fin. Prot. Bureau v. RD Legal Funding, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.