Legal Opinion

United States v. Intern. Broth. of Teamsters, Chauffeurs

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 29, 1996No. 88 Civ. 4486 (DNE)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

EDELSTEIN, District Judge:

BACKGROUND

This opinion emanates from the voluntary settlement of an action commenced by plain tiff United States of America (“the Government”) against, inter alia, defendant International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“the IBT” or “the Union”) and the IBT’s General Executive Board. The settlement is embodied in the voluntary consent order entered March 14, 1989 (“Consent Decree”). The goal of the Consent Decree is to rid the IBT of the hideous influence of organized crime through a two-phased implementation of the Consent Decree’s various remedial.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  2. National Ass'n of Letter Carriers v. SombrottoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  3. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  4. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Local Union 705, Truck Drivers, Oil Drivers, Filling Station & Platform WorkersDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Griffin v. PaineWebber Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  2. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  3. United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API