Beal v. Chicago, B. &. Q. R.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
At Law. Action by Timothy Beal against the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company and others. On motion to remand to state court.
1Opinion of the Court
PARIS, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a citizen and resident of Missouri, sued defendant Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, a citizen and resident of the state of Illinois, in a state court, for damages bottomed upon negligence, and joined as codefendants herein two Missouri corporations. The state court refused to 'allow a *181removal to this court (though on the filing by the nonresident defendant of a proper and sufficient bond and petition it had no discretion in the. premises), and thereupon the petitioning nonresident defendant lodged the transcript here, and plaintiff now moves to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Alabama Great Southern Railway Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Illinois Central Railroad v. SheegogSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Chi., RI & Pac. Ry. v. DowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. DowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McKinney v. Rodney C. Hunt Co.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1978
- Watson v. Chevrolet Motor Co. of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Ivy River Land & Timber Co. v. American InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Armour & Co. v. BowdenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Culp v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.