Armour & Co. v. Bowden
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
1. The pleadings and questions involved in these cases being the same, and the cases being briefed and argued together, they are so determined.
2. A suit, otherwise removable from a State court to the district court of the United States for the proper district under section 71 of the Federal judicial code (U. S. C. A. title 78, § 71), may be so removed when in the suit “there shall be a controversy which is wholly between citizens of different States, and which can be fully determined as between them.” The word “controversy” is to be construed as equivalent to the phrase “matter in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Gableman v. Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Hilton v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. DowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Southern Railway Co. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fowlkes v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Pearl Assurance Co. v. BernathSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Powell v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Southeastern Greyhound Lines v. EstesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
- General Motors Sales Corp. v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.