Legal Opinion
Remba v. Federation Employment & Guidance Service
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 2, 1990PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiff maintains that she was discharged because she objected to, and refused to participate in, defendant’s purported fraudulent billing of New York City, and that such retaliatory action is prohibited under Labor Law § 740 (2) (c) (the “Whistleblower” Law). This contention is unavailing, however, primarily because we agree with the Appellate Division that Labor Law § 740 (2) (c), like section 740 (2) (a), is triggered only by a violation of a law, rule or regulation that creates and presents…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sabetay v. Sterling Drug, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Leibowitz v. Bank Leumi Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Kern v. DePaul Mental Health Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Easterson v. Long Island Jewish Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Vella v. United Cerebral Palsy of New York City, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1988
3Cited by50 opinions
- Wieder v. SkalaNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Duane Reade, Inc. v. Cardtronics, LPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Webb-Weber v. Community Action for Human Services, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2014
- Collette v. St. Luke's Roosevelt HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Manigaulte v. C.W. Post of Long Island UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.