Smith v. C. I. T. Corporation
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) 1. It would seem that when the C. I. T. Corporation unqualifiedly and without reservation, in the absence of fraud or mistake, resold the contract to the W. L. Andrews Motor Company, it had no further interest in the contract. Whether the purchase of the car at a short-order sale is such a repossession of the car as to require the motor company to repurchase the contract under its repurchase agreement with C. I. T. Corporation will not now be passed on, as the terms of the repurchase agreement do not appear.
The petition did not allege insolvency of Smith,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wright, Williams & Wadley v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Thornton v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
- Devaughn v. ByromSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- National Bank v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Ennis v. Harralson Bros. & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Empire Banking Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Columbus Plumbing, Heating & Mill Supply Co. v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- General Finance & Thrift Corp. v. Bank of WrightsvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955