In re the Claim of Kreppel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 27, 1990, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
*1002The evidence established that claimant had previously been told that his attendance needed improvement and that he had been warned in writing that any further unexcused absences would result in his termination. The employer’s rules also gave it the prerogative to request a doctor’s note when an employee was absent due to an alleged illness. At the hearings,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Heil v. F & M Schaefer Brewing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- In re the Claim of SolanikowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Claim of ArmbrusterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of YagerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003