Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Kreppel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 9, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 27, 1990, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

*1002The evidence established that claimant had previously been told that his attendance needed improvement and that he had been warned in writing that any further unexcused absences would result in his termination. The employer’s rules also gave it the prerogative to request a doctor’s note when an employee was absent due to an alleged illness. At the hearings,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Heil v. F & M Schaefer Brewing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. In re the Claim of SolanikowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of ArmbrusterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. In re the Claim of YagerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API