Legal Opinion

Ross v. Smiley

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1902No. 2152Published

Error to the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtGunter, J.

This was an action hy a real estate agent to recover commissions. At the close of plaintiff’s case the court ruled, “I will grant the motion for a non-suit on the ground of failure to show an acceptance of the offer hy the purchaser, * * To review the ruling is this proceeding. The facts were: Defendant owned the Smiley Block in the city of Denver, upon which was an encumbrance in the principal sum of $30,000.00. Charles W. Pulton, residing in Scranton, Pennsylvania, knew the property, of the encumbrance thereon, and that plaintiff was defendant’s agent for its sale. Pulton owned real estate…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wm. Skinner & Sons' Ship-Building & Dry-Dock Co. v. HoughtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  2. Finnerty v. FritzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1879
  3. Buckingham v. HarrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  4. Godding v. DeckerColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Taylor v. WilliamsColorado Court of Appeals · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API