Legal Opinion
Monks v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided November 28, 1994No. 93-P-1258PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJacobs, J.
When the defendant board of appeals granted the defendant Cellular One a special permit to construct a tower measuring 190 feet in height, the plaintiffs brought a complaint in the Superior Court pursuant to G. L. c. 40A, § 17, seeking annulment of the permit. After its motion for summary judgment alleging that the plaintiffs lacked standing was denied, Cellular One sought reconsideration before *686another judge claiming that Barvenik v. Aldermen of Newton, 33 Mass. App. Ct. 129 (1992), decided after the denial of the motion, required rejection of the plaintiffs’ claim of standing. This appeal…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Attorney General v. BaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Boston Edison Co. v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Circle Lounge & Grille, Inc. v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Barvenik v. Board of Aldermen of NewtonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Marashlian v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Kenner v. Zoning Board of Appeals of ChathamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- Butler v. City of WalthamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
- Denneny v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Martin v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day SaintsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.