Legal Opinion
City of Urbana v. Andrew N.B.
Illinois Supreme Court
Decided June 24, 2004No. 95408, 95803 consPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fitzgerald
In separate proceedings, Andrew N.B. and Montrell D.H., both minors, entered uncounseled guilty pleas to violating municipal ordinances in the Cities of Urbana and Champaign and received dispositions of court supervision. When they violated the terms of their supervision, the Cities filed contempt petitions. The trial court found the minors in contempt and sentenced them to detention; the appellate court affirmed. The minors appealed, and we consolidated their cases. For the reasons that follow, we reverse and remand.
BACKGROUND
Though the facts in each case are similar, we review them…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- People v. PattersonIllinois Supreme Court · 2015
- People v. WhitfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re Parentage of John M.Illinois Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. WashingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. One 1998 GMCIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.