Legal Opinion

Smith-Booth-Usher Co. v. Los Angeles Ice & Cold Storage Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1917No. L. A. No. 3867PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Plaintiff sold a pump and pumping apparatus to defendant under circumstances hereinafter related. It was paid a part of the purchase price, the pump was installed, and failed to give good service. Defendant so notified plaintiff, demanded a return of its money, and requested a removal of the pump, in order that it might install one which would perform the desired service. Thereupon plaintiff brought this action to recover the unpaid part of the purchase price and defendant answered, averring that it purchased the pump under a warranty that it would deliver five hundred gallons of water per…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United Iron Works v. Outer Harbor Dock & Wharf Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Germain Fruit Co. v. J. K. Armsby Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Johnson v. PowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Bancroft v. San Francisco Tool Co.California Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gibbs v. SeegerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API