Legal Opinion
Paquin v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 31, 1996No. Civil Action 94-1261 SSHPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
Before the Court are defendant’s motion for summary judgment, plaintiffs opposition, defendant’s reply and plaintiffs surreply. Upon careful consideration of the record, defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted on all claims. Although “[findings of fact and conclusions of law are unnecessary on decisions of motions under Rules 12 or 56,” Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a), the Court nonetheless sets forth its reasoning.
BACKGROUND FACTS
Plaintiff, a 52-year-old male, began his employment as a management consultant with defendant, Federal National Mortgage…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- O'CONNOR v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Paul Paquin v. Federal National Mortgage AssociationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Grant v. May Department Stores Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Miller v. Eby Realty GroupDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- Castillo v. RenteriaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019