Legal Opinion

State v. Whisnant

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 8, 1967PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant having plead guilty of assault with a deadly weapon in open court, it is to be presumed that the jurors were present and heard this plea. When it was withdrawn and the defendant placed on trial the next day, we can only assume that the jurors remembered this and that the defendant was thus placed in a prejudiced position in his trial.

While the court could not compel the attendance of witnesses from Florida and West Virginia, it is possible that had the case been continued for the term, or at least continued until the second week as requested by the defendant, that he might have…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. . WhitfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Wall's Odorless Cleaners Inc. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. TolleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API