Legal Opinion

Wall's Odorless Cleaners Inc. v. Allen

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 18, 1934No. 23693PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeoxles, C. J.

1. Where suit is brought on a promissory note, the execution of the note “need not be proved, unless denied by a plea of non est factum.” McClain v. Georgian Co., 17 Ga. App. 648 (4) (87 S. E. 1090). In the instant case no such plea was filed, and the defendants in their pleas virtually admitted that they executed the note sued on and that they had the authority to do so. It follows that there is no merit in the single special ground of the oral motion for a new trial which complains of the admission of the note in evidence, over the defendants’ objection “that its execution by the defendant,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McClain v. Georgian Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  2. Hengstler v. Huguley-Scott Auto Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Swafford v. Certified Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  2. Gator Express Service, Inc. v. Funding Systems Leasing Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. State v. WhisnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Reid v. Marsol Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API