Jennings v. Emry
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge.
Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires a complaint to contain “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a)(2). In this case, the statement in the Appellants’ complaint is not short; rather, it is a lengthy 55 pages and 433 rhetorical paragraphs. The statement also is not plain; rather, it is prolix, disjointed, confusing, and at times unintelligible. And despite this length and complexity (or perhaps, in part, because of it), the complaint does not show that its pleaders are…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- Vicom, Inc. v. Harbridge Merchant Services, Inc., as Successor in Interest to Peach Tree Bancard Corporation, Judy Elliot, James ElliotCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Tel-Phonic Services, Inc., William Kirk, and John Bowen v. Tbs International, Inc. A/K/A Dy-Con, International, Inc. And the Dispatch Printing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Limestone Development v. Village of Lemont, Ill.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Mary Decker Slaney v. The International Amateur Athletic Federation and the United States Olympic CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Glover v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.