Shiras v. Ewing
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from, Franklin District Court. The opinión states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Strang, C.:
Action for damages. The plaintiff, who was also plaintiff' below, a resident of the city of Ottawa, in this state, contracted with the Cherryvale Water <& Manufacturing Company for a supply of water for the purpose of sprinkling his lawn, the use of the water to be regulated by the rules and regulations of the water company. The defendant, C. T. Ewing, the assignee and successor of the water company, by his agent, the manager of said water company, for the alleged violation of the rules and regulations of said company by the plaintiff, Mr. Shiras, in the use of the *171water…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Turner v. Revere Water Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- American Water-Works Co. v. State ex rel. WalkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Dodd v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Burke v. City of Water ValleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1905
- Seaton Mountain Electric Light, Heat & Power Co. v. Idaho Springs Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.