Legal Opinion

Young v. State of Oregon

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 2006No. CC 97C-10933; CA A114099; CA A113141; CA A113645; SC S51786PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

In this case, we must determine whether a wage and hour statute, former ORS 279.340(1) (1995), renumbered as ORS 653.268(1) (2005), required the state to pay “white-collar employees” 1 one and one-half times their “regular rate” for overtime or whether that statute instead permitted the state to pay those employees one-half their regular rate for overtime (known as a “fluctuating hours” rate, which we explain below). 2 Plaintiffs are state white-collar employees whom the state customarily has treated as exempt from overtime compensation. However, due to a change in statutory law, plaintiffs…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. ToevsOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Hekker v. Sabre Construction CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Sabin v. Willamette-Western CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Taylor v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Migis v. Autozone, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Oregon Education Ass'n v. Oregon Taxpayers UnitedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Young v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Lane v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. Marshall v. Pollin Hotels II, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API