Young v. State of Oregon
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.
In this case, we must determine whether a wage and hour statute, former ORS 279.340(1) (1995), renumbered as ORS 653.268(1) (2005), required the state to pay “white-collar employees” 1 one and one-half times their “regular rate” for overtime or whether that statute instead permitted the state to pay those employees one-half their regular rate for overtime (known as a “fluctuating hours” rate, which we explain below). 2 Plaintiffs are state white-collar employees whom the state customarily has treated as exempt from overtime compensation. However, due to a change in statutory law, plaintiffs…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. ToevsOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Hekker v. Sabre Construction CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Sabin v. Willamette-Western CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Taylor v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Migis v. Autozone, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Oregon Education Ass'n v. Oregon Taxpayers UnitedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Young v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Lane v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Marshall v. Pollin Hotels II, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.