North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Stamper
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Chief Judge.
Defendants argue that the trial court erred in determining that no UIM benefits were provided through decedent’s BAP because the covered vehicle was not a “private passenger motor vehicle” as required for interpolicy stacking under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-279.21(b)(4) (1993). We disagree.
The statute governing the stacking of UIM policies was amended and became effective in 1991, and decedent’s BAP was issued in 1992. Therefore, the UIM statute as amended applies in this case. However, the Supreme Court’s most recent pronouncements regarding UIM interpolicy stacking interpret…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. MabeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- Bray v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
- Bass v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Isenhour v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hlasnick v. Federated Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Erwin v. TweedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Nationwide Affinity Ins. Co. of Am. v. Le BeiCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- Iodice v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Erwin v. TweedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.