Legal Opinion
Rodriguez v. Editor in Chief
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 2, 2008No. 07-5234PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
This appeal was considered on the record of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. RApp. P. 84(a)(2); D.C.Cir. R. 34(j). It is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that those portions of the judgment of the district court not already affirmed by this court be affirmed for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum.
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing…
3Cases cited18 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- Lattisaw v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Rodriguez v. ShulmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Rodriguez v. DoeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Lattisaw v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Ashbourne v. HansberryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.