Legal Opinion
Lattisaw v. District of Columbia
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 5, 2016No. 15-7148PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*23JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders filed July 28, 2015 and November 4, 2015 be affirmed. Appellant raises no arguments on appeal challenging the district court’s conclusion that the District of Columbia was the only proper defendant for appellant’s claims. See U.S. ex rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp., 380 F.3d 488, 497 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (argument not made on appeal…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Atherton v. District of Columbia Office of the MayorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- United States Ex Rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Rodriguez v. Editor in ChiefCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
4Cited by3 opinions
- Bonelli v. Government of the Virgin IslandsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
- Ajenifuja v. DangoteDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Copeland v. Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026