Legal Opinion

Romans v. Bowen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1957No. 34134PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYeager, J.

This is an action at law by Russell Romans, plaintiff and appellee, against Roy Bowen, defendant and appellant, to recover an alleged balance of $1,575.20 due under a settlement of accounts made on March 15, 1954, between the parties growing out of a written agreement covering a joint farming and feeding operation of hogs and cattle on the land of the defendant, which was followed by an oral agreement for a feeding operation of hogs and to some extent the production of crops thereon. The action relates only incidentally to production of crops.

On trial of the case a jury returned a verdict in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City Savings Bank v. CarlonNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Miller v. OlanderNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Hahn v. DoyleNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Erwin v. Watson Bros. Transfer Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Lamme v. CarstensNebraska Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wieck v. BlessinNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Dell v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  3. State ex rel. Fitzgerald v. BarkusNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  4. In Re BarkusNebraska Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API