Legal Opinion

State v. Monroe

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided October 16, 1991No. 01-90-00667-CRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DUNN, Justice.

The State brings this interlocutory appeal to the trial court’s order granting the appellee’s, Michael Bennett Monroe’s, motion to suppress evidence.

The appellee, indicted for aggravated robbery, filed a pretrial motion to suppress evidence of unadjudicated offenses pending against him. He claimed that if he was convicted, the prosecutor would try to introduce evidence, under Tex.Code CRiM. P.Ann. art. 37.07, § 3(a) (Vernon Supp. 1991), of his unadjudicated offenses at the punishment stage of the trial. After a hearing, the trial court granted the appel-lee’s motion to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Werner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Moore v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Montalvo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. McCullough v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  4. State v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. State v. Howard, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API