McCullough v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
PLURALITY OPINION
RICHARD H. EDELMAN, Justice.
Kenneth Earl McCullough appeals a conviction for aggravated robbery1 on the ground that his trial counsel’s failure to object to hearsay testimony denied appellant effective assistance of counsel. We affirm.
To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, an appellant must show, first, that counsel’s performance was deficient, ie., it fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and, second, that the appellant was prejudiced in that there is a reasonable probability that but for counsel’s errors, the result of the proceeding would…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dinkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Busby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- State v. Monroe, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
3Cited by37 opinions
- Batiste v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
- Houston v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
- Arthur Kelvin Lovell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
- Brian Neil Vallejo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
- Byron Davis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2005
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.