Titus v. Wallick
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
We are of the opinion that the evidence upon the trial was entirely sufficient to justify the court below in granting the plaintiff the relief which he sought. We think the plaintiff *18established, by a fair preponderance of evidence, beneficial ownership in himself of the 250 shares of the capital stock of the Secor Hotel Company. We are impressed with the truthfulness of the testimony of the plaintiff, in which, as to his ownership of the stock in question, he was corroborated by the testimony of several disinterested witnesses of high character, whose probity cannot reasonably be questioned.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Treadwell v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Stephens v. CrawfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Stephens v. CrawfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
3Cited by3 opinions
- Titus v. WallickSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Moore v. MaddockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Titus v. WallickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932