In Re the Arbitration Between Hidrocarburos Y Derivados, C.A. & Lemos
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HAIGHT, District Judge:
This petition to compel arbitration pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1, 4, draws the parties into a second round of litigation preliminary to the resolution of commercial disputes by arbitrators. Arbitration agreements are intended to avoid litigation, not breed it. That salutary purpose is not always achieved.
The present petition is brought by Hidrocarburos y Derivados, C.A. (“Hideca”) to compel alleged beneficial and corporate owners of vessels to participate in, and be bound by, a pending arbitration arising out of a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Olga Zdanok v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods Division, Frank T. Alexander v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Fisser v. International BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Interocean Shipping Company v. National Shipping and Trading Corporation and Hellenic International Shipping, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Milwaukee Typographical Union No. 23 v. Newspapers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Hartford Financial Systems, Inc. v. Florida Software Services, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1982
- Oriental Commercial & Shipping Co. v. Rosseel, N.V.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- First American Bulk Carrier Corp. v. Van Ommeren Shipping (USA) LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Builders Fed.(Hong Kong) Ltd. v. Turner Const.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.