Legal Opinion

Paiewonsky v. Paiewonsky

District Court, Virgin Islands

Decided August 12, 1970No. Civil No. 93-1970PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChristian, Chief Judge

MEMORANDUM

Plaintiff-wife has filed suit against her husband. The complaint consists of two causes of action, as to which there is considerable contention between the parties regarding their real nature.

The complaint is characterized generally by defendant as one seeking relief for fraud and deceit as to love and affection in the inducement of marriage. By way of a label, the action has come to be designated in the caption as an “action for fraud and wilful hurt.” Plaintiff denies that her action is one based on fraud and deceit as to love and affection in the inducement of marriage. She…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Lydia Williams v. Delano DowlingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
  3. Cramer v. CramerAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Decker v. KedlyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906
  5. Caribe Construction Co. v. PennCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. SimmondsSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012
  2. Hartzog ex rel. Perez v. United Corp.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2011
  3. Berkeley v. West Indies Enterprises, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1971
  4. People v. VelasquezSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
  5. Yankee Atomic Electric Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API