Ruderman v. Warner-Lambert Pharmaceutical Co.
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas
1Opinion of the CourtLugg, J.
The first count of the complaint herein, as amended, alleges a cause of action against the manufacturer of a home permanent preparation. In language apparently inspired by the recent opinion in Hamon v. Digliani, 148 Conn. 710 (1961), the named plaintiff claims that in purchasing and using this product she relied upon representations and warranties made by the defendant through various advertising media. Her damages, she avers, spring from the falsity of those claims.
This demurrer asserts the failure of that count to allege that notice of the claimed breach of warranties was given to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mazetti v. Armour & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Klein v. Duchess Sandwich Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Hamon v. DiglianiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- LaHue v. Coca Cola Bottling, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
- Welshausen v. Charles Parker Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. CannonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Zeigler v. Sony Corp. of AmericaConnecticut Superior Court · 2004
- Gerrity v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Benchmark Building v. United Builders Supp., No. 62896 (May 29, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. CannonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982