Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Lumbermen's Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1907No. 6332PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for What-com county, Neterqr, J., entered March 29, 1906, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on a fire insurance policy.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, C. J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover upon a policy of insurance issued by the defendant to the plaintiff. Plaintiff recovered a judgment for $762.90. Defendant appeals.

After the issues of fact were made up by the complaint, answer, and reply, the case was tried to a jury. At the trial it was agreed that the policy was issued as alleged, and that a fire occurred while the policy was in force, and destroyed certain items of lumber; but it was claimed by the appellant that the policy of insurance covered only lumber which, was damaged or destroyed within the yards, and did not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cargill v. Millers' & Manufacturers' Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  2. Gross v. Milwaukee Mechanics' InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Home Mutual Insurance Co. of California v. RoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Jump v. North British & Mercantile InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Maisel v. Fire Ass'n of PhiladelphiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bothell v. National Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Niedringhaus v. Aetna InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925
  3. Johnson v. Franklin InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Henry Clay Fire Insurance v. CriderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API