Bridges v. Commonwealth

COMBS, Justice.

We granted review of Bridges’ conviction for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of (apparently) alcohol. The issue is whether the trial court erred to the defendant’s prejudice by including in its instructions to the jury a definition of “under the influence.” We hold that the trial court did so err, and reverse.

The elements of the charged offense are defined by KRS 189A.010(1):

No person shall operate a motor vehicle anywhere in this state while under the influence of alcohol or any other substance which may impair one’s driving ability.

The trial court’s…