Hall v. Alford
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Trespass quare clausum fregit by Edmund Hall against Charles Alford and another. From a judgment for defendants on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff, brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, C. J.
This action was in trespass, commenced in justice’s court, where judgment was given for defendants. On the trial in the circuit the court directed the verdict in favor of the defendants.
The declaration was in writing, and substantially avers that—
“The defendants, on the 15th day of April, 1895, with force and arms, the close of said plaintiff, situate in the township of Brownstown, said county, and known and described as-being ‘Horse Island,’ being situate directly east of -sections 1 and 12 in township 5 south, of range 10 east, with the adjacent shore, broke and entered, and with their feet…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Barney v. KeokukSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Lorman v. BensonMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
- Grand Rapids Booming Co. v. JarvisMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- City of Janesville v. CarpenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- Sterling v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Peterman v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Foust v. KinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Toledo Liberal Shooting Co. v. Erie Shooting ClubCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- St. Helen Shooting Club v. MogleMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Winans v. WillettsMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.