Legal Opinion

Hale v. Chatham

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 25, 1955No. 35549PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

An action brought by a real-estate broker to recover damages for breach of an alleged contract for commissions is subject to general demurrer when, it fails to allege that the broker has fully complied with the license laws of this State. (Regarding the necessity for license, see Code § 84-1413.) It is immaterial whether the point was argued and considered in the trial court or not. Cline v. Crane, 90 Ga. App. 192 (82 S. E. 2d 175); Mayo v. Lynes, 80 Ga. App. 4 (55 S. E. 2d 174); Moody v. Foster, 74 Ga. App. 829 (3) (41 S. E. 2d 560). Accordingly, the petition here by a real-estate broker,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mayo v. LynesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  2. Moody v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  3. Cline v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  2. Culverhouse v. Atlanta Ass'n for Convalescent Aged Persons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. Nussbaum v. ShafferCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  4. Brewer-Head Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  5. Charles F. Noyes Co. v. HadsellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API