Legal Opinion

Charles F. Noyes Co. v. Hadsell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 8, 1964No. 40593PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pannell, Judge.

1. Properly construed, the contract attached to the petition, and upon which the suit was based, is one agreeing to pay plaintiff for services as a real estate broker.

2. The petition, being one to recover for services as a real estate broker, was subject to general demurrer for failure to allege that the plaintiffs were licensed real estate brokers in accordance with the requirements of Code Ann. § 84-1401 and Code § 84-1413. See Mayo v. Lynes, 80 Ga. App. 4 (1, 2) (55 SE2d 174); D. L. Stokes & Co. v. McCoy, 212 Ga. 78 (90 SE2d 404); Cline v. Crane, 90 Ga. App. 192 (82 SE2d…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. DL STOKES & CO., INC. v. McCoySupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  2. Mayo v. LynesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  3. Hale v. ChathamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  4. Cline v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  5. Brewer-Head Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Charles F. Noyes Co. v. HadsellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API