Charles F. Noyes Co. v. Hadsell
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Pannell, Judge.
1. Properly construed, the contract attached to the petition, and upon which the suit was based, is one agreeing to pay plaintiff for services as a real estate broker.
2. The petition, being one to recover for services as a real estate broker, was subject to general demurrer for failure to allege that the plaintiffs were licensed real estate brokers in accordance with the requirements of Code Ann. § 84-1401 and Code § 84-1413. See Mayo v. Lynes, 80 Ga. App. 4 (1, 2) (55 SE2d 174); D. L. Stokes & Co. v. McCoy, 212 Ga. 78 (90 SE2d 404); Cline v. Crane, 90 Ga. App. 192 (82 SE2d…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- DL STOKES & CO., INC. v. McCoySupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- Mayo v. LynesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Hale v. ChathamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Cline v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Brewer-Head Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
3Cited by1 opinion
- Charles F. Noyes Co. v. HadsellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964