Morris v. Staab
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LEHMAN, Justice.
This ease involves a contractual dispute over the terms of an oil well lease. The trial court found the terms of the agreement ambiguous and decided in favor of appellees Leland and Barbara Staab (hereinafter Staabs). Appellants John N. Morris, Norma B. Morris, and Polo Ranch Company (hereinafter Morrises) appeal that judgment.
We affirm.
Morrises raise three issues:
1. Whether the district court erred in failing to grant [Morrises’] motion for summary judgment in the face of [Staabs’] deposition admissions that what they were suing for were normal daily operating costs.
2.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cargill, Inc. v. Mountain Cement Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Hillard v. MarshallWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Bigney v. BlanchardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Brazelton v. Jackson Drug Co., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Idaho Migrant Council, Inc. v. WarilaWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McCarthy v. James E. Simon Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- 71 Construction v. Wesco Electric, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1996