Legal Opinion

Roberts v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 4, 2002No. 1D01-0769PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Jermaine Roberts challenges his judgment of conviction and sentence for sale or delivery of cocaine. We affirm the convictions, but find that certain costs were erroneously imposed and therefore reverse in part.

With regard to his conviction, appellant argues that the trial court erred in granting the prosecution’s request, made during trial, to give a “principals” instruction to the jury. There was sufficient evidence adduced in the state’s case-in-chief to support such an instruction; accordingly, the trial court did not err in granting the request for such an instruction, despite the fact…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Justice v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. State v. RobySupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  3. Jacobs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  4. Bryant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  5. Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Finkelstein v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  2. Donald v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. ELIJAH BOWDEN v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  4. Gadson v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020
  5. Haggins v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API