Legal Opinion

Walston & Co. v. Miller

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1966No. 7338PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARY ANNE RICHEY, Superior Court Judge.

This appeal arises out of a cause of action brought by Walston and Co., Inc:, appellant, hereinafter referred to as Walston, against Joseph B. Miller and his wife, appellees, hereinafter referred to as Miller. Walston claimed when Miller’s commodity account was closed out on April 15, 1957, Miller owed it $1,105.85. Miller counterclaimed alleging that Walston owed Miller a duty to timely notify Miller of certain information which might affect prices on the World Sugar Market. Miller claimed that this failure caused him to lose monies deposited by Miller…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Richardson v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. In Re the Accounting of Mercantile Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Hunt v. Rosenbaum Grain Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Hadfield v. TracySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  5. Pacific Trading Co. v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Helen C. Carras and Bill G. Carras, Co-Executors of the Estate of Gus N. Carras, Deceased v. James S. Burns, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  2. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. Hand v. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Robinson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1971
  5. Henryk De Kwiatkowski v. Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc., Bear, Stearns Securities Corporation, and Bear Stearns Forex Inc., and Albert J. SabiniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API