Legal Opinion

Yonack v. Emery

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 13, 1929No. 1183-5178PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOritz, J.

We copy the following preliminary statement as set. out in the application for the writ:

“The appellee, C. A. Emery, filed his suit alleging that he was the owner of the property in controversy, and that Julius Yonack and Jacob Yonack are the owners of a certain note, dated November 3, 1925, for $2,009.00 payable $50.00 per month and interest, secured by a deed of trust upon said property; that Wm. T. Sargeant is Trustee in said Deed of Trust and at the request of Yonack Brothers posted notices for the sale of the property under said Deed of Trust, default having been made in the payment of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barnet v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Rosetti v. LozanoTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  3. International Building & Loan Ass'n v. BieringTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Stout, Goldsborough & Perry v. Ennis National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Spann v. SternsTexas Supreme Court · 1857

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. L. K. Peterson and William H. Scott, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  2. Kawauchi v. TabataHawaii Supreme Court · 1966
  3. National Bond & Mortgage Corp. v. MahaneyTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Hamilton v. BillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Riverdrive Mall, Inc. v. Larwin Mortgage InvestorsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API