In re Greene
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Coats
T1 The Attorney Regulation Counsel sought review of the Presiding Disciplinary Judge's order granting summary judgment in favor of Respondent Greene. The PDJ found that all of the claims in the complaint for attorney discipline should have been joined and adjudicated along with the claims raised in a previous complaint, and therefore they were barred according to the doctrine of claim preclusion.
12 Because none of the claims alleged in the instant complaint was identical with any claim that had already been finally adjudicat*692ed, the PDJ erred. The order granting summary judgment in favor of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pomeroy v. WaitkusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Argus Real Estate, Inc. v. E-470 Public Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Jeffrey v. District Court In & For the Eighth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- In Re FisherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Marquez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
- People v. KanwalSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
- West Colo. Motors v. General MotorsColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
- Layton Construction Co. v. Shaw Contract Flooring Services, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- Castillo v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.