Mayweathers v. Newland
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
D.W. NELSON, Senior Circuit Judge.
California State prison officials (“California”) bring a facial challenge to the constitutionality of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc et seq. (2000) (“RLUI-PA”), on various grounds. Their appeal arises from a series of preliminary injunctions, issued pursuant to RLUIPA, which allow Muslim prisoners to attend Friday afternoon religious services.
The district court upheld the statute as a constitutional exercise of Congress’s Spending Clause authority. We affirm.1
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
RLUIP…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Cutter v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Sossamon v. Lone Star State of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Nelson v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Alvarez v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Nathaniel Lindell v. Scott McCallumCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.