Legal Opinion

Mayweathers v. Newland

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 27, 2002No. Nos. 01-16505, 01-16607, 01-17133PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

D.W. NELSON, Senior Circuit Judge.

California State prison officials (“California”) bring a facial challenge to the constitutionality of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc et seq. (2000) (“RLUI-PA”), on various grounds. Their appeal arises from a series of preliminary injunctions, issued pursuant to RLUIPA, which allow Muslim prisoners to attend Friday afternoon religious services.

The district court upheld the statute as a constitutional exercise of Congress’s Spending Clause authority. We affirm.1

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

RLUIP…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Cutter v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Sossamon v. Lone Star State of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  3. Nelson v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  4. Alvarez v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Nathaniel Lindell v. Scott McCallumCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API