Legal Opinion

Denson v. Bronner

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 31, 2014No. 1110472PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURDOCK, Justice.

Tonya Denson, a member of the Employees’ Retirement System of Alabama (“the ERSA”), and Venius Turner, a member of the Teachers’ Retirement System of Alabama (“the TRSA”), brought this action on behalf of themselves, individually, as well as similarly situated members of the Retirement Systems of Alabama (“the RSA”), in the Montgomery Circuit Court against (1) David Bronner, in his official capacities as chief executive officer and secretary-treasurer of the ERSA, the TRSA, and the RSA1 and (2) the officers and members of the respective boards of *617control of the TRSA and the…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Ex Parte CranmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barnhart v. IngallsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2018
  2. Burks v. Retirement Systems of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 2015
  3. Wood v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2017
  4. Ex parte Limestone Cnty. Dep't of Human Res.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
  5. Barnhart v. IngallsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API