Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Lawyer Lee Walker

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 20, 2000No. 99-3071Published

1DissentGarth, Circuit Judge

This appeal seeks an answer to the question — when is a prison Cook Supervisor not a prison Corrections Officer? My answer to that question, in the present context, differs dramatically from the majority’s answer — my answer is never!

The majority’s opinion holds that, pursuant to the definition set forth by an earlier panel of this court, United States v. Walker, 149 F.3d 238 (3d Cir.1998) (“Walker I”), Cook Supervisor Wadeck, who was assaulted by the appellant Walker, neither was, nor is a Corrections Officer.1 In reaching this decision, the majority displays, as Justice Frankfurter stated,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Watts v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. United States v. Antonio Ruben Inigo, United States of America v. Raul Armando Giordano, United States of America v. Bruno SkerianzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Lawyer Lee WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. WalkerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API