Legal Opinion

United States v. Lawyer Lee Walker

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 24, 1998No. 97-7368PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

Lawyer Lee Walker appeals his sentence after pleading guilty to possession of a prohibited object by an inmate, 18 U.S.C. § 1791, and impeding a federal officer, 19 U.S.C. § 111. Specifically, he contends that the district court erred by applying U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3A1.2(b) (1997) (“Official Victim”) to impose a three-level enhancement to his sentence for assaulting a “corrections officer.” We conclude that the district court used the appropriate guideline, but misconstrued the phrase “corrections officer.” We will reverse and remand…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Sidney J. Dickler, Richard R. Petrucci. Sidney J. Dickler, in No. 94-3517. Richard R. Petrucci, in No. 94-3518Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Carlyle Eustace Wong, A/K/A Carlyle WongCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  3. The United States v. Peter Huff, John James Davis. Appeal of Peter HuffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. John Robert PowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. David George BrannanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Joseph B. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. Lawyer Lee WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. WalkerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. United States v. Lawyer Lee WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Lawyer Lee WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API